|
Lack of social cohesion hurts democracy |
|
One vote every four years does not guarantee liberty |
|
By Thomas Terrio |
|
The one thing people take for granted these days in Western democracies is the idea of freedom and democracy itself. Today more than ever before, thanks to social networking and the Internet, there is an enormous lack of social cohesion in society. This lack of social cohesion threatens our democracy to the very core. For example, most people today would rather converse with their iPod on Facebook or their Blackberry about issues not directly related to their well-being, rather then communicate candidly with someone sitting next to them on a bus or in the school library, even if they know them or not. This false, impersonal, and technological approach to human relations does not do justice to the idea we need to communicate with each other face to face about our common interests close to where we live. More often than not, people are more concerned about what happens in a country halfway across the globe, before they concern themselves with what is really happening in their local neighbourhood. The idea the Internet has opened up global communications is true, but the downside is people have forgotten to communicate with each other on a personal level—this is where democracy lives. More and more, people in the West are becoming disenchanted and disengaged with all three levels of government and the policies they propagate. In the last Canadian federal election, close to ten million registered voters did not cast their ballots, why? In my view, because of this lack of social cohesion, the former Bush administration was able to invade Iraq under the false pretenses of weapons of mass destruction. The previous government of Jean Chretien in Canada was able to sign the Kyoto Accord, circumventing the Canadian parliament. Recently, the political cowards in the West have revealed themselves. They would rather pay the Taliban to stop fighting NATO and ISAF, instead of pursuing them into the South West Autonomous Territories of Pakistan known as SWAT, to destroy them. How ridiculous, attempting to buy security with Western taxpayer dollars from a fanatical religious group whose single most prominent goal is to convert the world to Islam; in turn, setting the global community up for perpetual blackmail. Definitely not a bright idea—but a quick political solution. People may not realize it, but our democracy is in constant threat from the very governments we elect. Government lack of judgment in approving unaffordable stimulus packages, allowing the national debt to reach critical levels, or by spending a billion dollars on security alone for the 2010 Winter Olympic Games, is a clear indication freedom and economic security are in danger in the community. Unless people in their communities begin to use the democratic tools at their disposal, freedom and democracy will be lost one law at a time, and the so-called economic stimulus packages, once forced upon us as a last resort, will be taken away as some banker’s bonus one tax at a time. Ultimately, one vote every four years does not guarantee liberty, and those who rest comfortably in their democracy are definitely not exercising it.
Source: http://electionresources.org/ca/house.php?election=2008 |
|
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it. |
|
People are so docile right now. It is almost as if good government means when the politicians lie to us for our own good, for the public good, and bad government is when politicians lie for their own selfish interests. |
|
Afterthoughts |
|
Page design by Thomas Terrio www.viewfromthewest.ca ©2010 All rights reserved |
|
View from the West |
|
Edition no. 63 February 2010 |
