|
Arrogance and the existence of God |
|
Pope Benedict XVI displays unholy behavior |
|
By Thomas Terrio |
|
Arrogance is something distasteful to many, but when Pope Benedict XVI recently smacked the hand of a journalist, and then scolded him for asking a direct question about the recent allegations of sexual abuse plaguing the Catholic Church this past Holy Week, I thought it to be the supreme example of condescension. In my view, the Pope should humble himself at all times when in public. Indeed, this act clearly showed the impious, arrogant, and abusive attitude of the supreme leader of the Catholic Church, who professes himself to be the word of God on this Earth. Pope Benedict XVI is not the only religious leader lacking in self-respect. Religious leaders historically are seen to be connected to scandal in some fashion or another. Jim Jones, Jimmy Swaggart, the Ayatollah Khomeini or Warren Jeffs, all leave a lasting negative affect on religious belief in general. I am a great believer in philosophy, but not religion. Religion does two things above all others: it enslaves and manipulates its followers with dogma based on faith not reason. The Muslim and Christian faiths both affirm to be the divine providence of God. But does an omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent God exist and which religion holds the true path to God? Furthermore, does a true path to God even exist to begin with? Unfortunately, since the beginning of mankind’s founding of religion, much pain, suffering and death has been propagated in the name of God. Today, the suffering continues with Muslims leading the way, by subjugating women, practicing jihad, and participating in a global terror network based on converting the world to Islam. Muslims believe Mohammed is the sole prophet of God, with every non-Muslim considered an infidel or non-believer. How egotistical. If you’re going to fight for something, don’t do it in the name of God, do it for a good reason. While the Catholic Church put the fear of God into its followers claiming to know everything about heaven, hell, and what would happen to a sinner’s soul; this same church damned and condemned Galileo in 1616 for claiming the sun was the centre of the known universe. How crass. In my view, when one places their faith in religion, they are handing over their personal freedom to the manipulative whims of a priest, rabbi, or mullah’s interpretation of how one should live their life. Respect for human rights has been lost in today’s society because of religion. Religion separates people and creates cleavages in cultural, it does not unite them. Most certainly, the Christian church is based on the life of Jesus, but Jesus did not start the Christian church, it was Simon Peter BCE - AD 67, the first pope. I believe Jesus was a great prophet like Mohammed and Buddha, but I don’t believe Jesus was the direct descendant of God the Almighty, nor do I believe Mohammed is the only true prophet. In my opinion, when Jesus said he was the son of God, he was not speaking in the first person but the plural—meaning therefore, we are all children of God. Christian cathedrals are filled with towering icons representing Jesus, Mary and the saints, with the intention of creating an image of an ever-present Holy existence in the followers mind. Heraclitus, a great Greek philosopher circa 500 BCE said, and I paraphrase, praying to religious icons is like conversing with a house, while the owner is away. Socrates 450 BCE placed religious dogma in a difficult position when he asked a very simple question with respect to what is right or wrong according to the gods. He said, “Do the gods command it because it is good? Or is it good because the gods command it?” This profound statement placed in motion a philosophical interpretation that still remains unanswered today. As a species, can we accept our moral and ethical obligations with responsibility and respect towards each other? To decide without judgment based on race, religion, or sexual preference, to know the difference between what is right and what is wrong for humanity; without the need for priests, rabbis or mullahs, who in most cases represent an arrogant, egotistical and jealous representation of a higher power? In short, can mankind decide for itself what path it will take into the future without the stagnation, corruption, and misdirection of religion? As for the existence of God, Ayn Rand the mother of “ethical egoism” said in a 1979 interview, “There is no proof…you are never called upon to prove a negative, that is a law of logic.” In other words, I do not need to prove the existence of God to you. If I do not believe in the existence of a god, but you wish me to believe in God, then the onus is on you to prove to me God exists. Rand believes the existence of God is not based on reason or fact—better known in philosophical terms as a priori knowledge—but faith. “I am against God,” Rand said, “Because I do not want to destroy reason.” According to Rand, every argument for the existence of God in the course of human history is incomplete. Therefore in my humble opinion, by all means judge things for yourself.
Sources: The Elements of Moral Philosophy by James Rachels, Comtemporary Moral Problems by James E. White, Ayn Rand http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GS6vxb4H3M, Logic and Philosophy by Alan Hausman, Howard Hahane and Paul Tidman, The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin |
|
If you have a particular faith or religion, that is good. But you can survive without it. |
|
Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder. |
|
Afterthoughts |
|
Page design by Thomas Terrio www.viewfromthewest.ca ©2010 All rights reserved |
|
View from the West |
|
Know more. |
|
viewfromthewest.ca |
|
Edition no. 65 April 2010 |
